Legal Opinion

Howell v. Metropolitan Land Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 28, 1910No. 18,232PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; T. C. W. Ellis, Judge. Action by George P. Howell and others against the Metropolitan Land Company. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

This is a petitory action. Plaintiff relies solely on prescription. The land in controversy is that referred to as “the second concession” in the following description, which is admitted to be word for word the same in all the several deeds constituting plaintiff’s chain of titles, to wit;

“A certain portion of land, together with all the buildings, customs, ways, servitudes, or appurtenances thereunto belonging or in any wise appertaining, situated in this parish, about three miles below this city of New Orleans, on the same side of the Mississippi river, measuring one and a half arpents…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Terrill v. ChambersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1838

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bayard v. Baldwin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  2. Bruning v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  3. Industrial Lumber Co. v. FarqueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. Lacroix v. CraneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  5. Frost Lumber Industries, Inc. v. BlufordLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API