Legal Opinion

Sundh Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided November 2, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Sundh Electric Company against the General Electric Company. On motion for supplementary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

RAY, District Judge.

This court passed on the validity of the patents (Lindquist, Nos. 744,773 and 764,608) in Sundh Electric Co. v. General Electric Co., 198 Fed. 116, affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals 204 Fed. 277, 122 C. C. A. 475, and also on the question of infringement, a certain structure then before the court. The infringing device there is known bn this motion as “defendant’s infringing switch in suit.” See Exhibit H. No final decree has been entered, as the accounting is now in progress.

[1] The defendant is putting out devices which complainant claims are plain infringements,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. American Cork Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  2. Sundh Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1912
  3. Sundh Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Charles Green Co. v. Henry P. Adams Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. Public Service Cup Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API