Legal Opinion

Alam v. Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 14, 2012No. 10-4586Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARTH, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Shad Mohammed Alam was deemed removable by an Immigration Judge (IJ), who denied various applications for relief. When Alam appealed that determination to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), his case was remanded back to the IJ, who once again determined that he was subject to removal and not eligible for relief. In a November 24, 2010 decision, the BIA dismissed Alam’s appeal from that second decision of the IJ, and Alam now petitions for review of that dismissal. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the BIA’s dismissal of Alam’s appeal.

I

We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Xin Jie Xie v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Kaplun v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  4. Hua Wu v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API