Owsley v. . Henderson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBabNbxll, J.
The itemized, verified statement attached to the complaint was not admitted in evidence as such. It was admitted only after a witness competent to testify was examined and testified of his own knowledge concerning the matters and things therein contained. Exception thereto cannot be sustained.
Before the plaintiffs can recover against defendant surety company they must establish a debt against the contractor incurred in the fulfillment of his contract with the City of Charlotte. Hence, any evidence, including statements of the contractor, a party defendant, made in the course of his dealings…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Day & Maddock Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
- Louisiana Highway Commission v. McCainSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Town of Cornelius, Inc. v. LamptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Wiseman v. . LacySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Chozen Confections, Inc. v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Interstate Equipment Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Carolina Builders Corp. v. AAA Dry Wall, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Symons Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Southern Seeding Service, Inc. v. W.C. English, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Ruegamer v. Rocky Mountain Cementers, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.