Legal Opinion
Alicia Nieto Jacobs v. Maricopa County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 9, 1994No. 92-16675Published
1Opinion of the Court
24 F.3d 247
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Alicia Nieto JACOBS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MARICOPA COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 92-16675.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted April 13, 1994.
Decided May 9, 1994.
Before: SCHROEDER, D.W. NELSON, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Sibley Memorial Hospital v. Verne WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- 24 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1563, 24 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,401 Anne Owens v. Joseph F. RushCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Lutcher v. Musicians Union Local 47Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Patricia H. ROGERO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. B.M. NOONE, Individually and as Putnam County Tax Collector, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.