Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Byford v. Town of Asher

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 10, 1994No. 75849Published

1ConcurrenceOpala, Justice

The court holds today that the plaintiff’s proof in this negligence ease is sufficient to withstand a demurrer and reverses the trial court’s judgment for the defendant. On the record before it, the court concludes that the evidence adduced by the plaintiff supports a claim rested on the primary negligence of the Town of Asher [city]. Because there is some doubt whether a reasonably prudent person would agree that the plaintiff “assumed the risks” associated with crossing a public alley, the court remands the cause, in accordance with the mandate of Art. 23, § 6, Okl. Const.,1 for submission…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Sutherland v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. Buck v. Del City Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  4. Wetsel v. Independent School District I-1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. Markwell v. Whinery's Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API