Legal Opinion

Thomson v. Leak

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 2, 1933No. Docket No. 4898PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, J., pro tem.

By this action plaintiff seeks to recover from defendant certain moneys alleged to be due plaintiff from defendant under the terms of a written contract. The case was tried in the court below without a jury and judgment was ordered and entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff.

From such judgment the plaintiff appeals and the appeal is presented on the judgment-roll alone, consisting of the complaint, answer, findings of fact and conclusions of law and the judgment.

A great deal of comment concerning the facts has crept into the briefs, but we have no record of the…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Blair v. United States Ex Rel. Gregory-HoganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  5. Miller v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API