In re Rody
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
JAMES M. MARLAR, Chief Judge.
Dean Rody and Soroya Mohammadpour (“Debtors”) claimed various items of personal property exempt under 11 U.S.C. § 522(d). The chapter 7 Trustee objected that the Debtors were required to claim the Arizona exemptions, which, he asserted, applied beyond state borders (ECF No. 30). It was undisputed that Debtors, who had moved to Massachusetts prepetition, met the domiciliary requirements of the Bankruptcy Code for application of the Arizona exemptions. Debtors responded, however, that Arizona’s “opt-out” statute for use of the state exemptions was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Owen v. OwenSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Greene v. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Ford v. KonnoffUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- In Re UnderwoodUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Florida · 2006
- Camp v. IngallsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re LongUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2012
- Sheehan v. AshDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2017
- CLINTON JACOB KAUER and ALICIA MARIE KAUERUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Candace GoldsteinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 2021
- Steven C. WallworkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2020