Legal Opinion

Patek v. Ryskewiecz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1915No. Docket No. 123PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Gogebic; Cooper, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Julius J. Patek against William Ryskewiecz on an undertaking to secure plaintiff against the costs of an actioh. Defendant appealed to the circuit court from an adverse judgment. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case originated in justice’s court. It was tried before the court without a jury. The trial court filed a finding of fact and conclusion of law. The finding of fact was based upon a stipulated statement of the facts signed by the attorneys for the respective parties, which was as follows:

“(1) That on the 10th day of October, 1911, one Mary Talkowski, as plaintiff, commenced a suit in assumpsit against one Peter Puksta, as defendant, by ordinary summons, returnable before the aforesaid justice of the peace, at his office in the city of Ironwood, in said county, on the 18th day of October,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Forrest v. O'DonnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Brion v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Wilson ex rel. Farrand v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Hascall v. BrooksMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hassberger v. General Builders' Supply Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Twork v. Munising Paper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API