Legal Opinion

Wellnitz v. Muck

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1967No. 36500PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The question is whether a 4-year statute of limitations barred recovery on an unsettled account except the latest item, a debit. Plaintiff, a farm implement dealer, commenced this action on August 4, 1965, to recover a principal balance of $5,505.84 for repairs and sales. At the close of his evidence-in-chief the district court directed a $5.04 verdict for him on the latest item. It ruled that the claim was otherwise unenforceable.

The account, which covers about 12 years, was inactive at times. Plaintiff’s ledger sheet shows 7 intervals of 8 to 19 months between transactions and from December…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. HiskeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Reeves v. NyeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Pankau v. BoyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. T. S. McShane Co. v. Dominion Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Sodoro, Daly & Sodoro, P.C. v. KramerNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Winchell v. NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE T. & S. ASS'NNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API