DeSilva v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*253Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered January 22, 2004, which, to the extent appealable, granted the motion of defendants Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and New York City Transit Authority (Transit Authority) and the cross motions of defendants Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (Con Edison) and Empire City Subway (Empire) for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the cross motion of defendant Con Edison, to reinstate the complaint against this defendant, and otherwise…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gordon v. American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Schneider v. Kings Highway Hospital Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Bruni v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Dalton v. City of Saratoga SpringsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Gee v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cendales v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Tucker v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Baird v. GormleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Khemraj v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Lopez v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.