Legal Opinion

Derti v. Barg

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 19, 2021No. 7:19-cv-10215Unknown

1Opinion

MEMORANDUM ENDORSEMENT Derti v. Barg 19 CV 10215 (VB) On January 14, 2021, the Court received the attached letter from plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. (Doc. #27). Plaintiff requests leave to file an amended complaint and response to defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 22). A pro se litigant “should be afforded every reasonable opportunity to demonstrate he has a valid claim,” Satchell v. Dilworth,

745 F.3d 781, 785

(2d Cir. 1984), and should be granted leave to amend “at least once when a liberal reading of the complaint gives any indication that a valid claim might be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chavis v. ChappiusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. BNSF Railway Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API