Green v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurrence
B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge,
specially concurring:
I concur in the result. I write separately, however, to clarify our holding in Miller v. United States, 163 F.3d 591 (9th Cir.1998), and to emphasize that the discretionary function exception does not apply to the government’s failure to warn of an agency-created hazard.
I
The majority concludes that the Forest Service’s decisions regarding “how to attack a fire” and “the allocation of fire suppression resources” are susceptible to a policy analysis grounded in social, economic or political concerns, citing our decision in Miller. Opinion at 1251…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rayonier Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lorrin Whisnant, Individually v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Terbush v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sutton v. EarlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Miller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.