Legal Opinion

United States v. Burns

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided February 17, 1951No. Civ. A. No. J-641PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRIMBLE, Chief Judge.

This is an action in the nature of an interpleader brought by the United States of America, pursuant to Section 19, World War Veterans’ Act of 1924, as amended, and Section 617 of the National Service Life Insurance Act of 1940, as amended, Sections 445 and 817, Title 38 U.S.C.A., against the defendants herein who have or claim an interest in a policy of National Service Life Insurance issued by the plaintiff to Elisha Burns, deceased. The issu*629ance, terms or conditions of the policy not being in dispute, and liability of plaintiff thereon being admitted, a more particular…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pittinger v. PittingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  2. Lathan v. LathanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  3. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. MeridethSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  4. Cash v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  5. Missouri Pac. Railroad Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  2. Lillie Harris Burns v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  3. Watson v. WatsonHigh Court of American Samoa · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API