Legal Opinion
Moreno v. Goord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 8, 2006PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*709Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was given three hours within which to comply with a correction officer’s directive to produce a urine specimen. He was informed of the consequences of his failure to do so within the allotted time and was permitted to consume one eight-ounce glass of water each hour. When petitioner was unable to produce a urine specimen at the end of the three-hour…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Infante v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lopez v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Shun Zhong v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Jackson v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by9 opinions
- Genis v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Henderson v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Spulka v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Rogers v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Duffy v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.