Legal Opinion

School District Number One v. Holt

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1910PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Nodaway Circuit Court. — Now. William G. Ellison, Judge. (1) The contract is fully performed and is therefore taken out of the statute. Farrar v. Patton, 20 Mo. 81; Bless v. Jenkins, 129 Mo. 647. (2) The district took possession of the site sued for, and this possession was taken in pursuance of the contract sued on. School District v. Holmes, 53 Mo. App. 487. Taking possession is sufficient part-performance.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Nodaway Circuit Court. — Now. William G. Ellison, Judge. (1) The contract is fully performed and is therefore taken out of the statute. Farrar v. Patton, 20 Mo. 81; Bless v. Jenkins, 129 Mo. 647. (2) The district took possession of the site sued for, and this possession was taken in pursuance of the contract sued on. School District v. Holmes, 53 Mo. App. 487. Taking possession is sufficient part-performance. Young v. Montgomery, 28 Mo. 604. (3) The old site could not be abandoned until a new one was acquired. R. S, 1899, sec. 9852. (4) The board could not change the site. Siebert…

1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.

This is a suit to enforce specific performance of a verbal contract between plaintiff and defendant for the purchase by plaintiff of a schoolhouse site, the consideration to be the conveyance to the defendant of the old schoolhouse site of said school district.

*409In its petition plaintiff alleges that in December, 1857, Solomon Schell conveyed to Nodaway county, Missouri, certain land to be held in trust by said county for the use and benefit of the plaintiff district, which land was described in the deed of conveyance as follows: Beginning at a point twenty rods north, and nineteen rods east,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Boggs v. BodkinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. McCoy v. McCoyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Rice v. PeetNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  5. Johnston v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1837

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. CauthornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. Sursa v. CashMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Bentrup v. Johnson and Lehmann.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. State Ex Rel. Leonardi v. SherrySupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  5. State Ex Rel. Leonardi v. SherrySupreme Court of Missouri · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API