Legal Opinion

D.A.R. v. R.E.L.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 7, 2018No. 1151080PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

D.A.R. appeals from a judgment by the Baldwin Circuit Court dismissing his complaint against R.E.L., D.H., and R.H. We affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural History

On November 20, 2015, D.A.R., a licensed attorney practicing in Alabama, filed a complaint in the Baldwin Circuit Court against R.E.L., D.H., and R.H. R.E.L. is also a licensed attorney, who, at all times material to the allegations in the complaint, was employed as an assistant general counsel for the Alabama State Bar ("the ASB"). D.H. and R.H. are brothers; they are not attorneys.

According to the complaint, at some point before…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Burns v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Gonzales v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  5. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Forte v. The City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API