United States v. Interstate Circuit, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
Complainant alleges: That the Interstate Circuit, Inc., and the Texas Consolidated Theatres, Tnc., are Delaware corporations, with their principal place of business in the Majestic Theatre building, Dallas, Tex. That Karl Hoblitzclle and R. J. O’Donnell are residents of the city of Dallas. That Paramount, Vitagraph, RKO, Columbia, United Artists, Universal Film Exchanges, Inc., and Twentieth Century Fox, are corporate entities existing under and by virtue of laws of states other than Texas. That Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Distribution Corporation of Texas and Twentieth Century…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Momand v. Universal Film Exchange, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Parmelee Transportation Co. v. KeeshinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1956
- McLendon v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.