Legal Opinion

Quigley v. Zimmerman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 3, 1934No. 3322; No. 3323; No. 3324; No. 3325PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

These are appeals, consolidated for the purpose of the hearing in this court,' in interference proceedings from the decisions of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decisions of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellee, Marsden C. Hutto.

The party Zimmerman in Interference No. 59,935, Appeal No. 3322, the parties Zimmerman, Kern, and Batzer in Interference No. 60,701, Appeal No. 3323, and the parties Zimmerman and Kern in Interference No. 63,343, Appeal No. 3324, did not appeal to this court from adverse decisions, and,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Application of Ryohei OdaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API