Legal Opinion

Smith v. Earp

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided April 25, 1978No. Civ. A. 76-0083-0(G)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JAMES F. GORDON, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on oral motion to reconsider the Court’s supplemental order of February 23,1978, dealing with the apportionment of attorney fees to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a non-party subrogated reparation obligor. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the supplemental order shall stand and the amount ordered to be paid to the non-party subrogated reparation obligor remains reduced by its proportional share of the plaintiffs’ attorney fees. A statement of the background facts is helpful.

Bac…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. DeVincentis v. Maryland Casualty CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
  2. Stacy v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. KiddKentucky Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Willis v. SwainHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Southard v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1985
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. WaldeckKentucky Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API