Legal Opinion
United States v. Medina
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 31, 2017No. Criminal No. 2006-0232Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) Case No: 06-cr-232-RCL ) JAMIE MEDINA, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is defendant Jamie Medina’s motion [362] to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). This motion is based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines and must be analyzed under the “two step inquiry” set forth in Dillon v. United States,
560 U.S. 817
(2010). Under Dillon’s test, the Court must first determine if Mr. Medina is eligible for a sentence reduction under §…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. Ricardo EppsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- In Re SEALED CASECourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Aguilar-VargasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016