Legal Opinion

Hodgson v. Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1809PublishedCited by 24 opinions

ERROR to the circuit court of the district of Columbia, in an action of covenant upon a sealed policy, whereby the Marine Insurance Company of Alexandria, in consideration of seventeen and a half per cent, premium paid by the plaintiff Hodg80n’ i°r u George F. Straas and others,' of Rickmondf covenanted with the plaintiff for the said u QeorSre p, Straas and others, of Richmond, as well . , . * - . . J , ’ c inhis ownname as for and m the name and names of all and every…

Read the full summary

ERROR to the circuit court of the district of Columbia, in an action of covenant upon a sealed policy, whereby the Marine Insurance Company of Alexandria, in consideration of seventeen and a half per cent, premium paid by the plaintiff Hodg80n’ i°r u George F. Straas and others,' of Rickmondf covenanted with the plaintiff for the said u QeorSre p, Straas and others, of Richmond, as well . , . * - . . J , ’ c inhis ownname as for and m the name and names of all and every other person and persons to whom the same did, might, or should appertain, m part or m all,” to insure eight thousand…

1Opinion of the Court

February 24.

Cushing, J.

{Marshall, Ch. f. not sitting in the cause) delivered the opinion of the court,* as follows :

The insurance in this case being general, as well for the parties named ás “ for all and every other person or persons to whom the vessel did or might appertain,” and containing no warranty of neutrality, belligerent: as well as American property was covered by it., Some of .the párties being described as of Richmond, does not necessarily imply that they all resided there ; but if they did, mere.residence would not make them citizens; and even then, an express warranty was…

2Cited by24 opinions

  1. Jeffcott v. ætna Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Ope Shipping, Ltd. And El Porvenir Shipping Company, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Company, Inc., United States Fidelity & Guaranty Companies, Inc., Various British Underwriters and Underwriters at Lloyds, Vador Shipping, Ltd., and Cia. De Navegacion La Libertad, S.A. v. Allstate Insurance Company, Inc., United States Fidelity & Guaranty Companies, Inc., Various British Underwriters and Underwriters at Lloyds, Agua Shipping, Ltd., and Cia. De Navegacion Corinto, S.A. v. Allstate Insurance Company, Inc., United States Fidelity & Guaranty Companies, Inc., Various British Underwriters and Underwriters at Lloyds, Duras Shipping, Ltd., and Nicaraguense, S.A. v. Allstate Insurance Company, Inc., United States Fidelity & Guaranty Companies, Inc., Various British Underwriters and Underwriters at LloydsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  3. The Darien Bank v. The Travelers Indemnity Company, Jack Gore v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Amco Transworld, Inc. v. M/V BAMBIDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1966
  5. Daniel Whorton and Leroy Whorton, D/B/A Whorton Brothers Seafood Company, a Partnership v. The Home Insurance Company, Daniel Whorton and Leroy Whorton, D/B/A Whorton Brothers Seafood Company, a Partnership v. The Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API