Cassidy v. State

SCHOONOVER, Judge.

The appellant, David R. Cassidy, has appealed from the judgments and sentences entered pursuant to jury verdicts finding him guilty of trafficking in cannabis and *581conspiracy to traffic in cannabis. We affirm.

We find no merit in appellant’s contention that he was improperly convicted, and therefore we affirm the judgments entered by the trial court.

We also reject appellant’s contention that he was improperly sentenced under the sentencing guidelines. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(12) provides as follows:

12. Sentencing for separate offenses: A sentence must be…