Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Black Mountain Spruce, Inc.

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided August 6, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-M-145PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MATSCH, District Judge.

The plaintiff, J. Kent Daniels, was seriously injured while at work, when a blade came loose from a trimmer saw and hit him in the legs. Daniels has brought suit against two corporations allegedly responsible for the design and manufacture of the saw and against the federal government. The claim against the government is based on the allegation that an inspector from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) directed Daniels’ employer to remove a solid wood guard from the trimmer saw and replace it with a wire mesh screen.

After…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Barnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  3. Cunningham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Karen Russell, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of R. Scott Russell, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Ayala v. Joy Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mildred Galvin v. Occupational Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. Cooley v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1992
  3. Silva v. BrockDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
  4. Daniels (J. Kent) v. Black Mountain Spruce, Inc., Systimatic Company, Hydraulic Products & Design, Inc., U.SCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API