Legal Opinion
Universal Atl. Sys., Inc. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 14, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-4660PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWendy Beetlestone, District Judge
This case presents a straightforward legal question, one with which any first-year law student would be intimately familiar: Did the parties form a binding contract? As many a first-year law student can attest, however, answering that question-applying the law to actual facts-can be anything but straightforward, as this case illustrates. Plaintiff, Universal Atlantic Systems, Inc. ("Universal"), claims that it formed an implied-in-fact contract with Defendant, Honeywell International, Inc. ("Honeywell"), based on a series of meetings and communications between the parties in early 2014, and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Reginald D. Ware Ware Communications, Inc. v. Rodale Press, Inc. Ware CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Robert F. Byrnie v. Town of Cromwell, Board of Education, Body Corporate Cromwell Board of Education Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Corestates Bank, N.A. v. CutilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- AMETEK, INC. v. FedEx Trade Networks Transport & Brokerage, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- ATLANTIC STATES INSURANCE COMPANY v. COPART, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Azer Scientific Incorporated v. Quidel CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Brennan, Jr. v. FSD Pharma Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- DANSKO HOLDINGS, INC. v. BENEFIT TRUST COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.