Legal Opinion

Tarry v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 8, 2003No. CR 01-1022PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

On April 11, 2003, appellant, Samuel Warren Tarry, filed a motion urging this court to reconsider our October 11, 2001 per curiam decision denying his motion for a rule on the clerk. In support of his motion, Mr. Tarry argues that our decision denying his motion was not based upon adequate grounds and that “the ruling was arbitrary and frustrated the vindication of the petitioner’s federal rights.” We deny Mr. Tarry’s motion to reconsider and terminate the case.

In our October 11, 2002, per curiam opinion, we denied the motion for a rule on the clerk, holding that we would not grant a motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harkness v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Tarry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Wandrey v. EtchisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Tarry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API