Legal Opinion

Rohm & Haas Company v. National Labor Relations Board

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 2, 1966No. 10294_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

SOBELOFF, Circuit Judge:

The issue presented in this proceeding is whether the unit approved by the National Labor Relations Board is an appropriate one for purposes of collective bargaining. Rohm & Haas Company petitions for review of the Board’s order, issued October 14, 1965, determining that the company violated section 8(a) (5) of the National Labor Relations Act by refusing to bargain with the Seafarers International Union 1 2 upon request. The company admits that the union is certified by the Board as bargaining representative of the powerhouse employees, but justifies its refusal on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. S. D. Warren Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., and United Glass and Ceramic Workers of North America, Afl-Cio, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Industrial Rayon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  4. Royal McBee Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API