Legal Opinion

In Re Rennels

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided January 20, 1984No. 13-41354PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MERRITT S. DEITZ, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

The likely effect of our opinion today will be to reduce by more than eighty per cent the number of discharge hearings in the Western District of Kentucky. Because we deal with a statute which apparently would deny that outcome, the result can obtain only with a lengthened reach of creative interpretation. To the extent that our exercise departs from what could be called a tradition of strict constructionism in this district, we will move with measured pace, using only the standard juristic tools of statutory construction; legislative…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Secretary of the Interior v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re RothUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  2. In Re FultonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1985
  3. In Re ViltUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  4. In Re FlowersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API