Legal Opinion

Schroader v. Atkins

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Justice.

The sole question on appeal is whether one who has accepted the provisions of the Motor Vehicle Reparation Act, who is neither an owner, operator, maintainer, or user (as that term is defined by statute) of an automobile, is precluded from recovering damages in tort for pain, suffering, mental anguish and inconvenience by reason of K.R.S. 304.39-060(2)(b) and (c).

Respondent, a passenger in a motor vehicle operated by Roberta R. Trabue, was injured when the car collided with a vehicle operated by Movant, Schroader. Respondent’s claimed medical expenses did not exceed $1,000.00,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. MasonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1980
  2. D & B Coal Co. v. FarmerKentucky Supreme Court · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. David Alan Jenkins v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Baker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Department of Revenue, Finance and Administration Cabinet, Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Hale, Inc. D/B/A Lotsa PastaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2025
  5. Frederick Jones v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API