Legal Opinion

People v. Castro-Vasquez

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 2007No. B192721PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANELLA, J.

INTRODUCTION

The record of appellant’s 1991 guilty plea does not show that he was given the proper advisement of the potential immigration consequences of his plea, as required by Penal Code section 1016.5. After he was notified that deportation proceedings had been scheduled, appellant filed a statutory motion to vacate the guilty plea; there was no written opposition to the motion. After finding that appellant would not have pled guilty had he been properly advised, the trial court denied the motion on the ground that appellant had failed to establish prejudice.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re ResendizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. TotariCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. DubonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. SerranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. People v. AkhileCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. Alvarez CA5California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Caballero CA6California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. Hernandes CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API