Legal Opinion

Lee v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 29, 2006No. CR 99-1116PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellant Ledell Lee has filed a motion requesting this court to recall its mandate affirming the denial of his request for postconvcition relief. See Lee v. State, 343 Ark. 702, 38 S.W.3d 334 (2001). In support of his motion, Lee asserts that he was denied the assistance of qualified counsel during his postconviction proceedings, due to the fact that his appointed counsel was impaired by a substance-abuse problem. The State counters that there is no constitutional right to postconviction counsel; therefore, Lee has not been deprived of any established right that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Larimore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Robbins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  3. Mancia v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Wooten v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Sanders v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API