In Re the Marriage of Prybil
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LeGRAND, Justice.
This appeal presents two issues challenging the provisions of a dissolution of marriage decree. We resolve both against respondent and affirm the trial court.
I. The decree provided for a division of property and directed that neither party be awarded alimony from the other. However, it ordered respondent to pay accumulated temporary alimony which had been allowed upon petitioner’s application at the inception of the case. Although served with notice of hearing on that application, respondent failed to appear. A default order was entered granting petitioner $90 per week during…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Holi-Rest, Inc. v. TreloarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- Wolf v. MurraneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Rouse v. RouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Walsmith v. JacksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- Hanford v. HanfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of WinegardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- In Re the Marriage of DenlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- In Re the Marriage of CampbellCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1989
- Carney v. Carney, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1981
- Security State Bank v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988