Legal Opinion

Saylor v. WESTAR ENGERY, INC.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 22, 2009No. 100,012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

In Kansas, the law allows a worker injured from repetitive use or cumulative trauma, to designate the date of his or her accident as the date on which the employee gives written notice to the employer of the injuiy. In this appeal, the employer, Westar Energy, Inc., argues that it should not have to pay benefits to its employee, Cory Saylor, because on the date of the accident in his case, Saylor was home recuperating from knee surgery and not working. Our Workers Compensation Act directs the elements of an accident are not to be construed in a strict or literal sense but rather in a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Casco v. Armour Swift-EckrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Graham v. Dokter Trucking GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. Kansas v. McElroySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. Foos v. Terminix & Zurich America InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. Kimbrough v. University of Kansas Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Saylor v. Westar Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Slusher v. Wonderful House Chinese Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API