Legal Opinion

Pagosa Springs Investments v. Sivers

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1994No. 93CA1373Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge JONES.

Plaintiffs, Pagosa Springs Investments, a Colorado general partnership, and its general partners (collectively PSI) appeal the partial summary judgment in which the trial court ruled that application of the statute of limitations to the facts at issue mandated dismissal of PSI’s breach of warranty claim against defendant, Robert R. Sivers. Although no certification pursuant to C.R.C.P. 54(b) was entered, the partial summary judgment became final for appeal purposes when the claims against other defendants, who are not parties to this appeal, were dismissed with prejudice…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bernklau v. StevensSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  2. Tierney v. WhitingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
  3. Upton v. GriffittsColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API