Legal Opinion

Chicago G. W. Ry. Co. v. Mohan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 26, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon: Elbridge Hanecy, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes

Appellant claims, first, that the preponderance of the evidence is in its favor as to the' speed of the train, the ringing of the bell at the crossing, and as to the plaintiff’s contributory negligence; second, that there was error in refusing each of the eight refused instructions; and, third, that proper evidence was excluded; and that by reason of each and all of these claims the judgment should be reversed.

As to the matter of the speed of the train, the ringing of the bell and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff, we are of opinion, after a careful and critical reading of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Offutt v. World's Columbian ExpositionIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Consolidated Coal Co. v. ScheiberIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Swift & Co. v. RutkowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. KelseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chicago City Railway Co. v. PhillipsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  2. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. BanfillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API