Legal Opinion

Crowell v. United States (In re Crowell)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 18, 2002No. 01-5374PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Debtors Larry and Mary Crowell and Duane and Patricia Olcsvary appeal the ruling of the bankruptcy and district courts that Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Delegation Order (“DO”) 209 applies to their agreements with the IRS settling the tax treatment of certain partnership items. Because DO 209 deals specifically with delegated authority to enter into written settlement agreements in partnership cases, as opposed to the more general DO 97, we AFFIRM.

BACKGROUND

Debtors Larry and Mary Crowell and Duane and Patricia Olcsvary were partners in various cattle-breeding…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Robert Dan Orr v. Kathleen M. HawkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Crnkovich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Larry Crowell and Mary S. Crowell, Debtors. Larry Crowell, Mary S. Crowell, Duane C. Olcsvary, and Patricia C. Olcsvary v. United States of America and Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API