Legal Opinion

City of Norton v. Hutson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1935No. 32,355PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The defendant was convicted in the police court of violating a zoning ordinance, and on appeal the same result followed in the district court. He now brings his case to this court for review.

The material facts were these: Norton is a city of the second class. In 1931 the city adopted a zoning ordinance regulating and restricting the establishment of commercial enterprises and related matters of no present concern. The city was divided territorially into zones or districts, in a fashion which has become familiar in *306litigation. One of these…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Welch v. SwaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. City of Aurora v. BurnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Spurgeon v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Hunter v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. MSW, INC. v. Marion County Bd. of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  5. Johnson County Memorial Gardens, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API