City of Norton v. Hutson
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dawson, J.:
The defendant was convicted in the police court of violating a zoning ordinance, and on appeal the same result followed in the district court. He now brings his case to this court for review.
The material facts were these: Norton is a city of the second class. In 1931 the city adopted a zoning ordinance regulating and restricting the establishment of commercial enterprises and related matters of no present concern. The city was divided territorially into zones or districts, in a fashion which has become familiar in *306litigation. One of these…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Welch v. SwaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- City of Aurora v. BurnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Spurgeon v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Hunter v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- MSW, INC. v. Marion County Bd. of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
- Johnson County Memorial Gardens, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986