Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Highway Commission v. Dumas

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1964Published

1DissentBossman, J.

Before proceeding directly to the fact that the majority, in my belief, misinterprets and misstates the motion to strike which is the basis of the first assignment of error, I believe that it will be useful to devote a moment to the rule which governs the amount of recovery in a proceeding of this kind.

*461Highway Commission v. Holt, 209 Or 697, 308 P 181, was based upon a condemnation proceeding to take 1.05 acres of the defendants’ land. The defendants sought to show that they desired to nse their land, which was marshy, for industrial purposes and that preparatory to doing so they filled a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  2. City of Chicago v. GiedraitisIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Eubank v. SpencerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  4. Hanns v. FriedlyOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State Highway Commission v. HoltOregon Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API