Ball v. Bayada Home Health Care
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
McGEE, Chief Judge.
*2 Elizabeth Ball ("Plaintiff") appeals from a final decision of the North Carolina Industrial Commission ("the Commission"). The Commission utilized a particular method set *693 out in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2 (5) -Method 3-to calculate Plaintiff's average weekly wage for her temporary total disability benefits. We conclude that use of Method 3 was not "fair and just" to Plaintiff, a requirement of N.C.G.S. § 97-2(5). Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the Commission for calculation of Plaintiff's benefits using the appropriate statutory method.
I. Background
Plaintiff began her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Joyner v. AJ CAREY OIL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Purvis ex rel. Liles v. Faulkner Neon & Electric Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Shaw v. U.S. Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
- Conyers v. New Hanover County SchoolsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.