Legal Opinion

Ball v. Bayada Home Health Care

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 15, 2017No. COA16-1219Published

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Chief Judge.

*2 Elizabeth Ball ("Plaintiff") appeals from a final decision of the North Carolina Industrial Commission ("the Commission"). The Commission utilized a particular method set *693 out in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2 (5) -Method 3-to calculate Plaintiff's average weekly wage for her temporary total disability benefits. We conclude that use of Method 3 was not "fair and just" to Plaintiff, a requirement of N.C.G.S. § 97-2(5). Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the Commission for calculation of Plaintiff's benefits using the appropriate statutory method.

I. Background

Plaintiff began her…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Joyner v. AJ CAREY OIL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Purvis ex rel. Liles v. Faulkner Neon & Electric Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Shaw v. U.S. Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Conyers v. New Hanover County SchoolsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API