State v. Fulco
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sam Fulco was convicted of retailing intoxicating liquors without a license, and, an order having been madé suspending sentence and paroling defendant, W. A. Mabry, District Attorney, applies for writs of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.
The defendant was convicted of retailing intoxicating liquors without a license, and, on the 2d of March, 1914, was sentenced by the judge of the city court of Shreveport to pay a fine of $500 and costs and be imprisoned for six months, and, in default of the payment of the fine and costs, to be imprisoned for an additional term of six months.
On the 13th of September, 1914, the judge of the city court, after hearing evidence, and under authority of Act No. 74 of 1914, suspended the sentence and ordered the defendant paroled.
The district attorney has applied to this court for writs of…
2Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PlummerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
- State v. SerioSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- State v. DefattaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916