Legal Opinion

Keeney-Toelle Real Estate Co. v. Hillinghorst

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1959No. 30052PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Judge.

This is an action by which the plaintiff sought a judgment for $667.50. That sum was claimed as a commission due for procuring á purchaser for real estate at the request of the defendants. The action was started as an attachment suit with a garnishment in aid thereof. No property of defendant Laurette M. Hillinghorst was reached. Roy E. Hillinghorst answered and trial was had with him as the sole defendant. He defended on the ground that he did not own the property and that the plaintiff knew this and was to aid in securing title to it. At the close of the entire cause there was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Staples v. O'REILLYMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. EA Mabes and Company v. FishmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Bragg v. Ohio Chemical & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cecil F. Shopen v. Joseph M. Bone, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy of John D. Schindler, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  2. Duggins v. SimonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  3. Cincinnati M & M Realty, Inc. v. UckotterOhio Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API