Legal Opinion

FLOWERS BK. CO. v. City of Melbourne

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 1989No. 88-1391PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

537 So.2d 1040 (1989)

FLOWERS BAKING CO., etc., Petitioner,

v.

CITY OF MELBOURNE, Respondent.

No. 88-1391.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 5, 1989.

Rehearing Denied February 3, 1989.

Patricia K. Olney of Spielvogel and Goldman, P.A., Merritt Island, for petitioner.

Andrew A. Graham and Maureen M. Matheson of Reinman, Harrell, Silberhorn & Graham, Melbourne, for respondent.

COWART, Judge.

Petitioner applied for a conditional use permit for gasoline pumps and gasoline sales ancillary to a proposed convenience store in the City of Melbourne. Although the applicant agreed to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Irvine v. Duval County Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Irvine v. DUVAL COUNTY PLANNING COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. BML INVESTMENTS v. City of CasselberryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Snyder v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Hirt v. POLK CTY. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. City of Melbourne v. Hess Realty Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. City of Melbourne v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API