Legal Opinion

State v. Lopez

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 2011No. 29,382; 32,951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WECHSLER, Judge.

{1} Defendant Richard Lopez appeals from the district court’s order of criminal commitment, pursuant to NMSA 1978, Section 31-9-1.5(D) (1999). Defendant argues that the district court erred by (1) finding that there was sufficient evidence that Defendant inflicted great bodily harm while committing armed robbery, (2) concluding that armed robbery is a crime delineated in Section 31-9-1.5(D) permitting commitment, and (3) denying Defendant presentenee confinement credit for the period of detainment prior to the commitment. Because armed robbery that results in the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. DavisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Battishill v. Farmers Alliance InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Cesar B.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. State v. RodgersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API