Legal Opinion

Joseph v. Quest

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 29, 1982No. 60237PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

414 So.2d 1063 (1982)

Leon JOSEPH, etc., et al., Petitioners,

v.

Edward S. QUEST, et al., Respondents.

No. 60237.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 29, 1982.

Arnold R. Ginsberg of Horton, Perse & Ginsberg, and Hawkesworth & Schmick, Miami, for petitioners.

Edward L. Magill of Magill & Reid, Miami, for respondents.

McDONALD, Justice.

The Third District Court of Appeal certified the following question as being of great public importance:

[W]hether and under what circumstances an action for contribution lies against the parent of an injured child.

Quest v. Joseph, 392 So.2d 256, 262 n. 12 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Youngblood v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Ard v. ArdSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  4. Shor v. PaoliSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  5. Quest v. JosephDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dressler v. TubbsSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Woods v. WithrowSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  3. 3M Elec. Corp. v. VigoaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Chinos Villas, Inc. v. BermudezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Claire's Boutiques, Inc. v. LocastroDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API