Legal Opinion

Willis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 19, 1995No. 94-1487PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant challenges his habitual violent felony offender (HVFO) sentence, arguing that the written sentence does not conform to the oral pronouncement. The state correctly concedes error on this point. Although the trial court orally pronounced concurrent 10-year terms without eligibility for release for five years, the written HVFO order provides that appellant must serve 15 years without eligibility for release for 10 years. Where there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence, a remand is necessary to conform the written sentence to the oral…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frost v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. Polee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. Raymond Parker v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  4. Sermons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API