Meixell v. Kirkpatrick
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Labette District Court. Nr the February Term, 1882, of the district court, defendant Kirkpatrick had judgment against plaintiff Meixell, who brings the case here. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
The controversy between the present parties has already furnished this court with two cases, (Meixell v. Kirkpatrick, 25 Kas. 13, and Meixell v. Kirkpatrick, id. 19,) and this is the third case.
The present action was commenced by Worthington Meixell against S. S. Kirkpatrick in the district court of' Labette county, to obtain a decree declaring void and perpetually enjoining a judgment rendered by the district court of Wilson county. The plaintiff set forth in his petition various grounds upon which he claimed that said judgment should be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chambers Bros. & Co. v. King Wrought-Iron Bridge ManufactorySupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
- Meixell v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
3Cited by7 opinions
- Busenbark v. BusenbarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Carter v. HyattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Becker v. RootheSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Galbreath v. DroughtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- First National Bank v. Geneseo Town Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.