Legal Opinion

Insurance on Financed Motor Vehicles

Pennsylvania Department of Justice

Decided January 23, 1948Published

1Opinion of the Court

Umsted, Deputy Attorney General,

— You have asked to be advised concerning the legality of certain common practices followed in the placing of fire, theft and collision insurance upon financed motor vehicles. In the cases to which you refer us the facts are briefly as follows:

1. A motor vehicle dealer is a fire insurance agent. He sells an automobile on bailment lease and adds to the cost of the vehicle finance charges which include interest on the balance due and cost of fire, theft and collision insurance.1(a) He holds the lease and pockets the agent’s commission on the insurance;(b) He…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arcim Corp. v. PinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  2. Arcim Corporation v. PinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API