Legal Opinion

Kemi, Inc. v. Berlitz International, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 13, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The disputed provisions in Articles III and IV of the Asset Purchase Agreement do not specify exclusive remedies for breach of warranties made in Article VII thereof. Moreover, a remedy specified for breach of an individual contract term is not necessarily a remedy for breach of other terms in the contract.

The internal memorandum from defendant, produced by counterclaim defendants on their motion, does not show that the parties contemplated that the matter was settled and that there would be no further writings required (cf., Condo v Mulcahy, 88 AD2d 497, 500). We have considered counterclaim…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Condo v. MulcahyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deutsche Alt-A Securities Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2006-OA1 ex rel. HSBC Bank, USA, National Association v. DB Structured Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API