Legal Opinion

Stickney v. Haas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 2, 1950No. 1 Div. 368PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

• The question on this appeal is whether the demurrer filed by appellants to a bill for specific performance was properly overruled.

The substance of the facts alleged in the bill is that .on and prior to January 23, 1946, there was a house and lot in Mobile owned by three parties, Anna B. Stickney, Norma McAndrews and N. P. Boulet. They were all married: the sisters lived in Mobile and their brother, N. P. Boulet, lived in Memphis, Tennessee. The bill alleges that on that date the appellee, through a real estate broker, made an offer in writing to purchase said property for a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Jenkins v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Hooper v. Savannah & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Goodlett v. HansellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Obermark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trabits v. SnowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Trabits v. SnowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API