Browder v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL M. SPINDEN, Judge.
Brian Browder appeals the circuit court’s judgment to dismiss his motion for postconviction relief because it did not satisfy the filing deadline of Rule 24.035. He challenges the deadline as unconstitutional because the rule makes no provision for late filing of a postconviction motion for good cause shown. We affirm the circuit court’s judgment. Day v. State, 770 S.W.2d 692, 695 (Mo. banc), cert. denied sub nom., Walker v. State, 493 U.S. 866, 110 S.Ct. 186, 107 L.Ed.2d 141 (1989) (holding time limits of Rule 24.035 to be valid and mandatory).
In response to Browder’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- State v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- State v. TwenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- State v. RollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Broom v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003